The state of Florida is considering putting a law into action would strip teachers of their tenure, forcing teachers to be evaluated on a year by year basis (via standardized testing) to determine whether or not they’ll…ahem, we’ll, have a job next year. In other words, teachers would receive salary bonuses or be hired and fired based on their student’s performance on a test. I needn’t mention how absolutely fucked this plan is, but what the hell, may as well do so while I’m here, right?
Currently teachers, after their first three years of teaching, are no longer expected to sign a yearly contract. We have tenure or job security at that point. And as much as I may hate work, or may be disaffected by my current job, knowing that I have job security is nice. Though we are evaluated yearly by our higher ups, unless we are in that three year probationary period, our evaluations aren’t fodder for hiring and firing. That is unless you’re a huge ass that is highly ineffective. I’d like to think that I’m not a huge ineffective ass.
Therein lays the beauty of the administrative evaluation: the people currently evaluating us are people who, for better or worse, see us on a daily basis. They are people that can help us grow professionally in areas of deficiency. The academic coaches are there as well to lend even more professional support. In short, they do not foster a sense of competition; rather they are there to help us along the way. Don’t get me wrong, a crappy teacher is a crappy teacher, and maybe could or should be fired. Keep in mind though, as with any other business (yup, let’s not forget that the education system is a business) there are currently methods and means in place for hiring and firing. So why change things up? I’ve a few ideas that are fairly rational.
The state wants to save money, and they can effectively save a bunch of money if they only sign teachers to yearly contracts, and determine their effectiveness based off of some sort of standardized test. How? Simple really. Let’s look at McDonalds for example. McDonalds, over the years, has made a practice of relieving employees of their responsibilities when they get to a certain level where they’d potentially receive a raise. Financially speaking, McDonalds saves lots of money when they consistently fire old employees, and hire new ones. Fret not, they do pass the savings on to you one $.69 hamburger at a time. Something similar could potentially be put into place. Sure, under a model like this, tired or ineffective teachers would be weeded out and replaced with young, hungry teachers. But, at what cost?
Is firing a teacher based on how students perform really a means to an end? Maybe her/his students, for one reason or another bombed the test. Also, can an evaluation given in March truly be an accurate measure of what a student knows by the end of the year, three months later? Are those scenarios really something for which a teacher can or could or should control? Lest we forget, a child’s education is more than book knowledge. How can what a child learns be completely evaluated by something like a standardized test? Let’s face it, there are also some students that aren’t hard wired for academic or book knowledge, rather they’re (more so) hard wired for hands on or technical training. To that end, is it my fault when they don’t understand the concept of the Pythagorean theory?
Connected with this, the state wants to end the Class Size Amendment. Right now, I’m sitting pretty at twenty-three students. When I first started, I had thirty plus students. The Class Size Amendment did two things: it made teacher’s lives easier because it shrank the amount of students in any given class, and it opened the door to hiring new teachers.
Stripping this amendment would mean that less teachers would be needed, and those current teachers would be teaching more students. Now connect the two plans: with less teachers being hired, and with those that are currently hired staring down the barrel of a gun because of student’s performance, a new era of teacher versus teacher competition will be ushered in. It’s going to be a blood-bath! Teacher A competes against teachers B and C to prove that she/he is better, so that she/he doesn’t get fired.
To think I was worried that if all of this would come to fruition the union would speak up and quell our fears, reassuring us that everything will be OK. But, as with everything the Pinellas County Teachers Associations deals with, I’m sure they’ll drop the ball yet again as they haven’t really been seen fighting against the state as of yet. But at least I get the PCTA discount to Sea World. Maybe now is as good of time as any to move out of Florida.